Andrea Pora

Self-worth · Blog

The inner critic isn't telling you the truth — it's repeating what someone once said

The inner critic often feels like honest self-reflection — but it's usually a learned voice, shaped by early experience and absorbed inward over time

By Andrea Pora · 10 June 2026 · 5 min read

The inner critic isn’t telling you the truth — it’s repeating what it once heard

You finish something — a presentation, a dinner with friends, a text message — and almost before it’s fully over, a voice moves in. It picks up details. The slightly awkward pause. The word you could have chosen differently. It doesn’t ask you how you’re feeling. It already has a verdict.

Most people assume that voice is honest. That it’s simply noticing things, that it represents a fair assessment of who they are and how they’re doing. It can feel almost rational — measured, quiet, devastatingly specific.

But the inner critic is not a fair witness. It is, more often than not, a recording. A set of responses that were learned in a particular environment, at a particular time, by a younger version of you who needed some way to make sense of the world she was living in.


What the inner critic actually sounds like from the inside

It is worth pausing here, because the inner critic rarely announces itself as a problem. It often sounds like self-awareness.

It sounds like: I’m just being honest with myself. Or: I’m keeping myself in check. Or that familiar, almost resigned internal tone — Well, this is just who I am.

For many women, the critic runs in the background so constantly that silence feels more alarming than the noise. A moment of genuine quiet — not being picked apart — can feel oddly unsafe. Suspicious, even.

Sometimes it’s sharp and specific. Sometimes it’s a low-level hum of insufficiency that doesn’t have particular words. Sometimes it speaks in someone else’s cadence — a tone you’d recognise if you heard it on the phone, a particular rhythm of disappointment you’ve heard before.

That last detail matters more than it might seem.


Where it comes from — not as an explanation to dismiss it, but as a way of seeing it clearly

The inner critic is not a character flaw. It is not evidence that something is fundamentally wrong with you. In most cases, it is an internalised voice — a set of evaluations, standards, or expressions of disappointment that once came from outside, and were gradually absorbed inward.

This is partly how early attachment works. When we are young and entirely dependent on the adults around us, we are exquisitely sensitive to their reactions. We develop internal models — maps of how relationships work, what we need to do or be to remain close to the people we need. If criticism was common, inconsistent, or sharp in your environment, the nervous system doesn’t simply log that as something that happened. It learns from it. It tries to get ahead of it.

Internal Family Systems (IFS) — a framework developed by psychologist Richard Schwartz — names this particularly well. It describes the inner critic not as your core self, but as a part of you: one that took on a protective role. The logic, in a child’s mind, runs something like this: If I criticise myself before anyone else can, the blow lands softer. If I keep myself small, or correct, or invisible, I will be safer.

That logic made sense once. It may have been genuinely useful. The question therapy tends to sit with is: is it still serving you, or has it become a habit that no longer fits the life you’re actually in?


Where it shows up, often without being named

The inner critic doesn’t only appear in obvious moments of self-doubt. It tends to shape things more quietly.

It might show up as chronic over-preparation — working twice as long as needed because no draft feels good enough. As difficulty receiving a compliment without immediately deflecting or qualifying it. As a pattern of apologising before you’ve done anything wrong, or explaining yourself at length in situations that didn’t ask for it.

It often shapes relationships in ways that are easy to misread as personality. Difficulty expressing needs directly — because some part of you expects they’ll be dismissed, or that having them in the first place is too much. The habit of monitoring other people’s moods and adjusting yourself accordingly. A particular exhaustion after social situations that weren’t objectively difficult.

Work is another place it concentrates. The presenter who cannot hear praise for what she just did, only the one question that felt pointed. The woman who attributes her successes to circumstance and her failures to character — not as a considered analysis, but reflexively, automatically.

These patterns are explored in more depth as part of self-worth & boundaries work, because the critic and our relationship to our own needs are rarely separate stories.


What therapy can hold around this

Therapy doesn’t silence the critic through willpower or positive affirmations. That approach tends not to work — and in some cases, the cheerful counter-voice only creates another internal argument.

What a slower, more careful therapeutic process can offer is something different: the chance to meet that voice rather than fight it or be ruled by it. To become curious about where it came from, what it was protecting, how old it feels. Sometimes people are surprised to find that the critic sounds most like the version of themselves that was about eight or nine — not the adult in the room at all.

Somatic work can be useful here, because the critic often lives in the body as much as in thought. A tightening in the chest. A particular quality of bracing. Noticing where criticism lands physically can be a way of working with it that doesn’t require it to make verbal sense first.

The therapeutic relationship itself also matters. Being consistently received — having someone reliably curious about your experience without judging it — can, over time, begin to shift what feels possible. Not through a single conversation, but through accumulation. That is a slow process. Therapy is honest about that.


A thought to carry, not a conclusion

If the inner critic is a voice that was learned, it means it is not the truth about you. It means it has a history. And history — unlike character — can be looked at.

You don’t have to like the critic, or thank it, or try to turn it into a friend. You just might, eventually, stop quite so automatically believing it.

That’s not a small thing. For some people it’s the work of years. But it begins with a moment like this one: noticing that the voice and the self are not the same.


Read the main page on Self-worth →

If something here landed, you can book a free 30-min first conversation with Andrea — no pressure, just to find out if she's the right person to walk this part with you.

Book a free first conversation

More on this topic

Why this practice is safe to try

First conversation30 min · 0 €Book free